India - Household Expenditure on Services Durable Goods : NSS Round 72, Schedule 1.5, July 2014 - June 2015
Reference ID | DDI-IND-MOSPI-NSSO-72Rnd-Sch1.5-July2014-June2015 |
Year | 2014 - 2015 |
Country | India |
Producer(s) | National Sample Survey Office |
Sponsor(s) | M/o Statistics & Programme Implementation, GOI - MOSPI - |
Collection(s) | |
Metadata | Documentation in PDF |
Created on
Nov 04, 2016
Last modified
Nov 21, 2016
Page views
309722
- Block1 & 2 - Ide
ntification of sampl
e household and part
iculars of field ope
ration - Block 3 - Household
characteristics - Block 4 - Demographi
c particulars of hou
sehold members - Block 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- transport expendit
ure, misc. consumer
services, repairs an
d maintence of selec
ted items, AMC contr
acts, hotel lodging
charges, during last
7 days or last 30 d
ays or 365 days. - Block 10 - Expenditu
re on durable goods
acquired during the
last 365 days other
those used exclusive
ly for entrepreneuri
al activity.
Variable Groups
Sub-Stratum-no
(SubStratumNo)
File: Block1 & 2 - Identification of sample household and particulars of field operation
File: Block1 & 2 - Identification of sample household and particulars of field operation
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: character Width: 2 | Valid cases: 83600 Invalid: 0 |
Value | Category | Cases | |
---|---|---|---|
01 | 22491 | 26.9% | |
02 | 13817 | 16.5% | |
03 | 25761 | 30.8% | |
04 | 9704 | 11.6% | |
05 | 4210 | 5.0% | |
06 | 2224 | 2.7% | |
07 | 1485 | 1.8% | |
08 | 1025 | 1.2% | |
09 | 618 | 0.7% | |
10 | 430 | 0.5% | |
11 | 309 | 0.4% | |
12 | 263 | 0.3% | |
13 | 215 | 0.3% | |
14 | 211 | 0.3% | |
15 | 117 | 0.1% | |
16 | 96 | 0.1% | |
17 | 47 | 0.1% | |
18 | 46 | 0.1% | |
19 | 46 | 0.1% | |
20 | 47 | 0.1% | |
21 | 46 | 0.1% | |
22 | 36 | 0.0% | |
23 | 47 | 0.1% | |
24 | 47 | 0.1% | |
25 | 48 | 0.1% | |
26 | 47 | 0.1% | |
27 | 48 | 0.1% | |
28 | 24 | 0.0% | |
29 | 24 | 0.0% | |
30 | 24 | 0.0% | |
31 | 23 | 0.0% | |
32 | 24 | 0.0% |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.