India - Household Expenditure on Services Durable Goods : NSS Round 72, Schedule 1.5, July 2014 - June 2015
Reference ID | DDI-IND-MOSPI-NSSO-72Rnd-Sch1.5-July2014-June2015 |
Year | 2014 - 2015 |
Country | India |
Producer(s) | National Sample Survey Office |
Sponsor(s) | M/o Statistics & Programme Implementation, GOI - MOSPI - |
Collection(s) | |
Metadata | Documentation in PDF |
Created on
Nov 04, 2016
Last modified
Nov 21, 2016
Page views
314442
- Block1 & 2 - Ide
ntification of sampl
e household and part
iculars of field ope
ration - Block 3 - Household
characteristics - Block 4 - Demographi
c particulars of hou
sehold members - Block 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- transport expendit
ure, misc. consumer
services, repairs an
d maintence of selec
ted items, AMC contr
acts, hotel lodging
charges, during last
7 days or last 30 d
ays or 365 days. - Block 10 - Expenditu
re on durable goods
acquired during the
last 365 days other
those used exclusive
ly for entrepreneuri
al activity.
Variable Groups
Household size
(b3q1)
File: Block 3 - Household characteristics
File: Block 3 - Household characteristics
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: character Width: 2 | Valid cases: 83600 Invalid: 0 |
Value | Category | Cases | |
---|---|---|---|
01 | 36 | 0.0% | |
02 | 50 | 0.1% | |
03 | 131 | 0.2% | |
04 | 187 | 0.2% | |
05 | 143 | 0.2% | |
06 | 89 | 0.1% | |
07 | 43 | 0.1% | |
08 | 32 | 0.0% | |
09 | 11 | 0.0% | |
1 | 3834 | 4.6% | |
10 | 1040 | 1.2% | |
11 | 587 | 0.7% | |
12 | 376 | 0.4% | |
13 | 241 | 0.3% | |
14 | 171 | 0.2% | |
15 | 105 | 0.1% | |
16 | 62 | 0.1% | |
17 | 42 | 0.1% | |
18 | 41 | 0.0% | |
19 | 17 | 0.0% | |
2 | 7026 | 8.4% | |
20 | 18 | 0.0% | |
21 | 10 | 0.0% | |
22 | 9 | 0.0% | |
23 | 8 | 0.0% | |
24 | 5 | 0.0% | |
25 | 3 | 0.0% | |
26 | 2 | 0.0% | |
29 | 1 | 0.0% | |
3 | 11864 | 14.2% | |
31 | 2 | 0.0% | |
4 | 20907 | 25.0% | |
40 | 1 | 0.0% | |
5 | 16530 | 19.8% | |
6 | 10522 | 12.6% | |
7 | 5092 | 6.1% | |
8 | 2816 | 3.4% | |
9 | 1546 | 1.8% |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.