INDIA - Sixth Economic Census 2013-14
Reference ID | DDI-IND-MOSPI-6-EC-2013-14 |
Year | 0 |
Country | INDIA |
Producer(s) | Central Statistics Office - Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation |
Sponsor(s) | Ministry of Statistics & Programme Implementation - MoSPI - |
Metadata | Documentation in PDF |
Created on
Jun 20, 2017
Last modified
Apr 02, 2018
Page views
5311330
- EC6A_ST01_JAMMU_AND_
KASHMIR - EC6A_ST02_HIMACHAL_P
RADESH - EC6A_ST03_PUNJAB
- EC6A_ST04_CHANDIGARH
- EC6A_ST05_UTTARAKHAN
D - EC6A_ST06_HARYANA
- EC6A_ST07_DELHI
- EC6A_ST08_RAJASTHAN
- EC6A_ST09_UTTAR_PRAD
ESH - EC6A_ST10_BIHAR
- EC6A_ST11_SIKKIM
- EC6A_ST12_ARUNACHAL_
PRADESH - EC6A_ST13_NAGALAND
- EC6A_ST14_MANIPUR
- EC6A_ST15_MIZORAM
- EC6A_ST16_TRIPURA
- EC6A_ST17_MEGHALAYA
- EC6A_ST18_ASSAM
- EC6A_ST19_WEST_BENGA
L - EC6A_ST20_JHARKHAND
- EC6A_ST21_ODISHA
- EC6A_ST22_CHHATTISHG
ARH - EC6A_ST23_MADHYA_PRA
DESH - EC6A_ST24_GUJARAT
- EC6A_ST25_DAMAN_AND_
DIU - EC6A_ST26_D_AND_N_HA
VELI - EC6A_ST27_MAHARASHTR
A - EC6A_ST29_KARNATAKA
- EC6A_ST30_GOA
- EC6A_ST31_LAKSHADWEE
P - EC6A_ST32_KERALA
- EC6A_ST33_TAMILNADU
- EC6A_ST34_PUDUCHERRY
- EC6A_ST35_A_AND_N_IS
LANDS - EC6A_ST36_TELANGANA
- EC6A_ST37_ANDHRA_PRA
DESH
District
(District)
File: EC6A_ST32_KERALA
File: EC6A_ST32_KERALA
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: character Width: 4 | Valid cases: 3355004 Invalid: 0 |
Value | Category | Cases | |
---|---|---|---|
3201 | 01 - Kasaragod | 142836 | 4.3% |
3202 | 02 - Kannur | 252078 | 7.5% |
3203 | 03 - Wayanad | 93348 | 2.8% |
3204 | 04 - Kozhikode | 242280 | 7.2% |
3205 | 05 - Malappuram | 334250 | 10.0% |
3206 | 06 - Palakkad | 246234 | 7.3% |
3207 | 07 - Thrissur | 286832 | 8.5% |
3208 | 08 - Ernakulam | 386584 | 11.5% |
3209 | 09 - Idukki | 149656 | 4.5% |
3210 | 10 - Kottayam | 226108 | 6.7% |
3211 | 11 - Alappuzha | 202837 | 6.0% |
3212 | 12 - Pathanamthitta | 124056 | 3.7% |
3213 | 13 - Kollam | 231485 | 6.9% |
3214 | 14 - Thiruvananthapuram | 436420 | 13.0% |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.