INDIA - Sixth Economic Census 2013-14
Reference ID | DDI-IND-MOSPI-6-EC-2013-14 |
Year | 0 |
Country | INDIA |
Producer(s) | Central Statistics Office - Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation |
Sponsor(s) | Ministry of Statistics & Programme Implementation - MoSPI - |
Metadata | Documentation in PDF |
Created on
Jun 20, 2017
Last modified
Apr 02, 2018
Page views
5297512
- EC6A_ST01_JAMMU_AND_
KASHMIR - EC6A_ST02_HIMACHAL_P
RADESH - EC6A_ST03_PUNJAB
- EC6A_ST04_CHANDIGARH
- EC6A_ST05_UTTARAKHAN
D - EC6A_ST06_HARYANA
- EC6A_ST07_DELHI
- EC6A_ST08_RAJASTHAN
- EC6A_ST09_UTTAR_PRAD
ESH - EC6A_ST10_BIHAR
- EC6A_ST11_SIKKIM
- EC6A_ST12_ARUNACHAL_
PRADESH - EC6A_ST13_NAGALAND
- EC6A_ST14_MANIPUR
- EC6A_ST15_MIZORAM
- EC6A_ST16_TRIPURA
- EC6A_ST17_MEGHALAYA
- EC6A_ST18_ASSAM
- EC6A_ST19_WEST_BENGA
L - EC6A_ST20_JHARKHAND
- EC6A_ST21_ODISHA
- EC6A_ST22_CHHATTISHG
ARH - EC6A_ST23_MADHYA_PRA
DESH - EC6A_ST24_GUJARAT
- EC6A_ST25_DAMAN_AND_
DIU - EC6A_ST26_D_AND_N_HA
VELI - EC6A_ST27_MAHARASHTR
A - EC6A_ST29_KARNATAKA
- EC6A_ST30_GOA
- EC6A_ST31_LAKSHADWEE
P - EC6A_ST32_KERALA
- EC6A_ST33_TAMILNADU
- EC6A_ST34_PUDUCHERRY
- EC6A_ST35_A_AND_N_IS
LANDS - EC6A_ST36_TELANGANA
- EC6A_ST37_ANDHRA_PRA
DESH
Tahsil / Taluka / P.S. / Dev . Block Circle / Mandal
(Tahsil)
File: EC6A_ST14_MANIPUR
File: EC6A_ST14_MANIPUR
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: character Width: 7 | Valid cases: 229838 Invalid: 0 |
Value | Category | Cases | |
---|---|---|---|
1401001 | 2336 | 1.0% | |
1401002 | 684 | 0.3% | |
1401003 | 880 | 0.4% | |
1401004 | 1733 | 0.8% | |
1401005 | 1757 | 0.8% | |
1401006 | 2136 | 0.9% | |
1401008 | 11 | 0.0% | |
1402001 | 581 | 0.3% | |
1402002 | 270 | 0.1% | |
1402003 | 1430 | 0.6% | |
1402004 | 1372 | 0.6% | |
1403001 | 2972 | 1.3% | |
1403002 | 1310 | 0.6% | |
1403003 | 3185 | 1.4% | |
1403004 | 12895 | 5.6% | |
1403005 | 2154 | 0.9% | |
1404001 | 9075 | 3.9% | |
1404002 | 8136 | 3.5% | |
1404003 | 14552 | 6.3% | |
1404004 | 81 | 0.0% | |
1405001 | 9156 | 4.0% | |
1405002 | 26387 | 11.5% | |
1405003 | 10401 | 4.5% | |
1406001 | 7978 | 3.5% | |
1406002 | 4162 | 1.8% | |
1406003 | 25430 | 11.1% | |
1406004 | 14152 | 6.2% | |
1406005 | 40 | 0.0% | |
1406006 | 21 | 0.0% | |
1407000 | 179 | 0.1% | |
1407001 | 4995 | 2.2% | |
1407002 | 8434 | 3.7% | |
1407003 | 23325 | 10.1% | |
1407004 | 8396 | 3.7% | |
1407014 | 17 | 0.0% | |
1408000 | 6 | 0.0% | |
1408001 | 1446 | 0.6% | |
1408002 | 5586 | 2.4% | |
1408003 | 693 | 0.3% | |
1408004 | 656 | 0.3% | |
1408005 | 717 | 0.3% | |
1409001 | 630 | 0.3% | |
1409002 | 4241 | 1.8% | |
1409003 | 2197 | 1.0% | |
1409004 | 3000 | 1.3% | |
1409009 | 39 | 0.0% | |
1409064 | 4 | 0.0% |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.