Digg
Google Buzz
LinkedIn
Stumbleupon
Delicious
INDIA - Sixth Economic Census 2013-14
| Reference ID | DDI-IND-MOSPI-6-EC-2013-14 |
| Year | 0 |
| Country | INDIA |
| Producer(s) | Central Statistics Office - Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation |
| Sponsor(s) | Ministry of Statistics & Programme Implementation - MoSPI - |
| Metadata |
 Documentation in PDF
|
Created on
Jun 20, 2017
Last modified
Apr 02, 2018
Page views
5297497
- EC6A_ST01_JAMMU_AND_
KASHMIR - EC6A_ST02_HIMACHAL_P
RADESH - EC6A_ST03_PUNJAB
- EC6A_ST04_CHANDIGARH
- EC6A_ST05_UTTARAKHAN
D - EC6A_ST06_HARYANA
- EC6A_ST07_DELHI
- EC6A_ST08_RAJASTHAN
- EC6A_ST09_UTTAR_PRAD
ESH - EC6A_ST10_BIHAR
- EC6A_ST11_SIKKIM
- EC6A_ST12_ARUNACHAL_
PRADESH - EC6A_ST13_NAGALAND
- EC6A_ST14_MANIPUR
- EC6A_ST15_MIZORAM
- EC6A_ST16_TRIPURA
- EC6A_ST17_MEGHALAYA
- EC6A_ST18_ASSAM
- EC6A_ST19_WEST_BENGA
L - EC6A_ST20_JHARKHAND
- EC6A_ST21_ODISHA
- EC6A_ST22_CHHATTISHG
ARH - EC6A_ST23_MADHYA_PRA
DESH - EC6A_ST24_GUJARAT
- EC6A_ST25_DAMAN_AND_
DIU - EC6A_ST26_D_AND_N_HA
VELI - EC6A_ST27_MAHARASHTR
A - EC6A_ST29_KARNATAKA
- EC6A_ST30_GOA
- EC6A_ST31_LAKSHADWEE
P - EC6A_ST32_KERALA
- EC6A_ST33_TAMILNADU
- EC6A_ST34_PUDUCHERRY
- EC6A_ST35_A_AND_N_IS
LANDS - EC6A_ST36_TELANGANA
- EC6A_ST37_ANDHRA_PRA
DESH
Village or Town
(Village_or_Town)
File: EC6A_ST26_D_AND_N_HAVELI
File: EC6A_ST26_D_AND_N_HAVELI
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: character Width: 11 | Valid cases: 11183 Invalid: 0 |
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26010010001 | 25 |  0.2%
| |
| 26010010002 | 38 | 0.3%
| |
| 26010010003 | 26 | 0.2%
| |
| 26010010004 | 132 | 1.2%
| |
| 26010010005 | 33 | 0.3%
| |
| 26010010006 | 44 | 0.4%
| |
| 26010010007 | 104 | 0.9%
| |
| 26010010008 | 41 | 0.4%
| |
| 26010010009 | 57 | 0.5%
| |
| 26010010010 | 83 | 0.7%
| |
| 26010010011 | 90 | 0.8%
| |
| 26010010012 | 8 | 0.1%
| |
| 26010010013 | 29 | 0.3%
| |
| 26010010014 | 224 | 2.0%
| |
| 26010010015 | 180 | 1.6%
| |
| 26010010016 | 34 | 0.3%
| |
| 26010010017 | 87 | 0.8%
| |
| 26010010018 | 318 | 2.8%
| |
| 26010010019 | 19 | 0.2%
| |
| 26010010020 | 100 | 0.9%
| |
| 26010010021 | 85 | 0.8%
| |
| 26010010022 | 22 | 0.2%
| |
| 26010010023 | 39 | 0.3%
| |
| 26010010024 | 22 | 0.2%
| |
| 26010010025 | 111 | 1.0%
| |
| 26010010026 | 30 | 0.3%
| |
| 26010010027 | 138 | 1.2%
| |
| 26010010028 | 180 | 1.6%
| |
| 26010010029 | 31 | 0.3%
| |
| 26010010030 | 88 | 0.8%
| |
| 26010010031 | 67 | 0.6%
| |
| 26010010032 | 20 | 0.2%
| |
| 26010010033 | 4 | 0.0%
| |
| 26010010034 | 372 | 3.3%
| |
| 26010010035 | 5 | 0.0%
| |
| 26010010036 | 5 | 0.0%
| |
| 26010010037 | 3 | 0.0%
| |
| 26010010039 | 5 | 0.0%
| |
| 26010010040 | 5 | 0.0%
| |
| 26010010041 | 6 | 0.1%
| |
| 26010010042 | 29 | 0.3%
| |
| 26010010043 | 103 | 0.9%
| |
| 26010010044 | 15 | 0.1%
| |
| 26010010045 | 10 | 0.1%
| |
| 26010010046 | 5 | 0.0%
| |
| 26010010047 | 30 | 0.3%
| |
| 26010010048 | 3 | 0.0%
| |
| 26010010049 | 27 | 0.2%
| |
| 26010010050 | 27 | 0.2%
| |
| 26010010051 | 35 | 0.3%
| |
| 26010010052 | 35 | 0.3%
| |
| 26010010053 | 102 | 0.9%
| |
| 26010010054 | 121 | 1.1%
| |
| 26010010055 | 5 | 0.0%
| |
| 26010010056 | 19 | 0.2%
| |
| 26010010057 | 16 | 0.1%
| |
| 26010010058 | 37 | 0.3%
| |
| 26010010059 | 16 | 0.1%
| |
| 26010010060 | 20 | 0.2%
| |
| 26010010061 | 12 | 0.1%
| |
| 26010010062 | 17 | 0.2%
| |
| 26010010063 | 55 | 0.5%
| |
| 26010010064 | 40 | 0.4%
| |
| 26010010065 | 7 | 0.1%
| |
| 26010017001 | 4710 | 42.1%
| |
| 26010018001 | 1015 | 9.1%
| |
| 26010018002 | 569 | 5.1%
| |
| 26010018003 | 454 | 4.1%
| |
| 26010018004 | 316 | 2.8%
| |
| 26010018005 | 423 | 3.8%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.