India - Survey on Migration and Ownership of Land by Non-Tribals in Trible Areas: NSS 44th Round, Schedule 29.3, July 1988 - June 1989
Reference ID | DDI-IND-MOSPI-NSSO-44Rnd-Sch29dot3-1988-89 |
Year | 0 |
Country | India |
Producer(s) | National Sample Survey Office |
Sponsor(s) | M/o Statistics & Programme Implementation, GOI - MOSPI - |
Collection(s) | |
Metadata | Documentation in PDF |
Created on
Mar 10, 2016
Last modified
Mar 31, 2016
Page views
228972
- Block-1-Identificati
on of sample househo
ld-records - Block-5-Household ch
aracteristics-record
s - Block-6-Demographic
and migration partic
ulars-records - Block-7-activity par
ticulars-records - Block-8-of land owne
d and possessed-reco
rds - Block-9-disposal of
land-records - Block-10-assets owne
d-records - Block-11-loans-recor
ds
State code
(State)
File: Block-5-Household characteristics-records
File: Block-5-Household characteristics-records
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: character Width: 2 | Valid cases: 10056 Invalid: 0 |
Value | Category | Cases | |
---|---|---|---|
02 | Andhra Pradesh | 862 | 8.6% |
03 | Assam | 341 | 3.4% |
04 | Bihar | 874 | 8.7% |
05 | Gujarat | 440 | 4.4% |
06 | Haryana | 0 | 0.0% |
07 | Himachal Pradesh | 249 | 2.5% |
08 | Jammu & Kashmir | 0 | 0.0% |
09 | Karnataka | 672 | 6.7% |
10 | Kerala | 352 | 3.5% |
11 | Madhya Pradesh | 1415 | 14.1% |
12 | Maharashtra | 965 | 9.6% |
13 | Manipur | 7 | 0.1% |
14 | Meghalaya | 64 | 0.6% |
15 | Nagaland | 107 | 1.1% |
16 | Orissa | 755 | 7.5% |
17 | Punjab | 0 | 0.0% |
18 | Rajasthan | 642 | 6.4% |
19 | Sikkim | 308 | 3.1% |
20 | Tamil Nadu | 540 | 5.4% |
21 | Tripura | 191 | 1.9% |
22 | Uttar Pradesh | 207 | 2.1% |
23 | West Bengal | 727 | 7.2% |
24 | A & N Islands | 59 | 0.6% |
25 | Arunachal Pradesh | 112 | 1.1% |
26 | Chandigarh | 0 | 0.0% |
27 | Dadra & Nagar Haveli | 76 | 0.8% |
28 | Delhi | 0 | 0.0% |
29 | Goa | 0 | 0.0% |
30 | Lakshdweep | 55 | 0.5% |
31 | Mizoram | 36 | 0.4% |
32 | Pondicherry | 0 | 0.0% |
33 | Daman & Diu | 0 | 0.0% |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.