India - Household Consumer Expenditure: NSS 46th Round, Schedule 1, July 1990 - Jun1991
| Reference ID | DDI-IND-MOSPI-NSSO-46Rnd-Sch1.0-1990 |
| Year | 0 |
| Country | India |
| Producer(s) | National Sample Survey Office |
| Sponsor(s) | M/o Statistics & Programme Implementation, GOI - MOSPI - |
| Collection(s) | |
| Metadata |
Documentation in PDF
|
Created on
Mar 10, 2016
Last modified
Mar 31, 2016
Page views
289553
- Blocks 1,3,10_Househ
old Characteristics - Block 4_Person recor
ds - Block 5_Monthly hous
ehold expenditure on
food and non-food i
tems - Block 6_Monthly hous
ehold expenditure on
clothing - Block 7_Monthly hous
ehold expenditure on
footwear - Block 8_Monthly hous
ehold expenditure on
miscellaneous goods
and services - Block 9_Monthly hous
ehold expenditure on
durables
Variable Groups
State
(State)
File: Block 4_Person records
File: Block 4_Person records
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: character Width: 2 | Valid cases: 135476 Invalid: 0 |
Questions and instructions
Literal question
State
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02 | Andhra Pradesh | 9008 | |
| 03 | Assam | 4876 | |
| 04 | Bihar | 11221 | |
| 05 | Gujarat | 5559 | |
| 06 | Haryana | 2172 | |
| 07 | Himachal Pradesh | 2457 | |
| 08 | Jammu & Kashmir | 1426 | |
| 09 | Karnataka | 6079 | |
| 10 | Kerala | 4937 | |
| 11 | Madhya Pradesh | 11050 | |
| 12 | Maharashtra | 11583 | |
| 13 | Manipur | 2350 | |
| 14 | Meghalaya | 1758 | |
| 15 | Nagaland | 775 | |
| 16 | Orissa | 5226 | |
| 17 | Punjab | 5041 | |
| 18 | Rajasthan | 6151 | |
| 19 | Sikkim | 830 | |
| 20 | Tamil Nadu | 8315 | |
| 21 | Tripura | 2222 | |
| 22 | Uttar Pradesh | 17313 | |
| 23 | West Bengal | 8176 | |
| 24 | A & N Islands | 1147 | |
| 25 | Arunachal Pradesh | 1131 | |
| 26 | Chandigarh | 166 | |
| 27 | Dadra & Nagar Haveli | 333 | |
| 28 | Delhi | 1217 | |
| 29 | Goa | 173 | |
| 30 | Lakshdweep | 385 | |
| 31 | Mizoram | 1861 | |
| 32 | Pondicherry | 396 | |
| 33 | Daman & Diu | 142 |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.



Documentation in PDF