India - Household Consumer Expenditure Survey: 64th Round, Schedule 1.0, July 2007 - June 2008
Reference ID | DDI-IND-NSSO-64-SCHEDULE-1.0 |
Year | 0 |
Country | India |
Producer(s) | National Sample Survey Office,NSSO |
Sponsor(s) | Ministry of Statistics & P.i, Govenment of Indis - MOSPI - |
Collection(s) | |
Metadata | Documentation in PDF |
Created on
Aug 21, 2015
Last modified
Aug 22, 2015
Page views
288053
- Identification of Sa
mple Household - Household Characteri
stics - Demographic and othe
r particulars of hou
sehold members - Consumption of food,
pan, tobacco , into
xicants and fuel dur
ing the last 30 days - Consumption of cloth
ing, bedding and foo
twear during the las
t 365 days - Expenditure on educa
tion , medical (inst
itutional) goods and
services during the
last 365 days and e
xpenditutre on misce
llaneous goods and s
ervices including, r
ents and taxes durin
g the last 30 days - Expenditure for purc
hase and constructio
n (including repair
and maintenance) of
durable goods for do
mestic use during th
e last 365
Variable Groups
FOD_Region
(FOD_Region)
File: Identification of Sample Household
File: Identification of Sample Household
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: character Width: 3 | Valid cases: 50297 Invalid: 0 |
Value | Category | Cases | |
---|---|---|---|
000 | 3396 | 6.8% | |
001 | 4 | 0.0% | |
003 | 4 | 0.0% | |
009 | 4 | 0.0% | |
011 | Jammu | 388 | 0.8% |
012 | Srinagar | 464 | 0.9% |
015 | 4 | 0.0% | |
021 | Shimla | 896 | 1.8% |
031 | Jalandhar | 720 | 1.4% |
032 | Ludhiana | 560 | 1.1% |
033 | 4 | 0.0% | |
042 | 4 | 0.0% | |
051 | Dehradun | 663 | 1.3% |
061 | Chandigarh | 1124 | 2.2% |
071 | Delhi | 621 | 1.2% |
081 | Ajmer | 980 | 1.9% |
082 | Jaipur | 1220 | 2.4% |
091 | Agra | 1078 | 2.1% |
092 | Allahabad | 1720 | 3.4% |
093 | Bareilly | 1008 | 2.0% |
094 | Lucknow | 1218 | 2.4% |
101 | Muzaffarpur | 2136 | 4.2% |
102 | Patna | 1364 | 2.7% |
111 | Gangtok | 572 | 1.1% |
121 | 16 | 0.0% | |
131 | Kohima | 712 | 1.4% |
141 | 24 | 0.0% | |
150 | 4 | 0.0% | |
151 | 20 | 0.0% | |
161 | 64 | 0.1% | |
171 | Shillong | 704 | 1.4% |
181 | Guwahati | 620 | 1.2% |
182 | Dibrugarh | 592 | 1.2% |
191 | Barddhaman | 1360 | 2.7% |
192 | Kolkata | 1150 | 2.3% |
193 | Maldah | 1004 | 2.0% |
201 | Ranchi | 1231 | 2.4% |
202 | 4 | 0.0% | |
211 | Bhubaneswar | 1276 | 2.5% |
212 | Sambalpur | 800 | 1.6% |
221 | Raipur | 955 | 1.9% |
226 | 4 | 0.0% | |
231 | Bhopal | 883 | 1.8% |
232 | Gwalior | 1056 | 2.1% |
233 | Jabalpur | 828 | 1.6% |
241 | Ahmedabad | 984 | 2.0% |
242 | Baroda | 1335 | 2.7% |
247 | 4 | 0.0% | |
271 | Aurangabad | 1035 | 2.1% |
272 | Mumbai | 935 | 1.9% |
273 | Nagpur | 894 | 1.8% |
274 | Pune | 1150 | 2.3% |
281 | Cuddapah | 1069 | 2.1% |
282 | Hyderabad | 1438 | 2.9% |
283 | Vijayawada | 988 | 2.0% |
291 | Bangalore | 1110 | 2.2% |
292 | Hubli | 988 | 2.0% |
301 | 144 | 0.3% | |
321 | Kozhikode | 690 | 1.4% |
322 | Thiruvanathapuram | 828 | 1.6% |
331 | Coimbatore | 1046 | 2.1% |
332 | Chennai | 1024 | 2.0% |
333 | Madurai | 956 | 1.9% |
351 | Port Blair | 212 | 0.4% |
402 | 4 | 0.0% | |
983 | 4 | 0.0% |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.