India - Survey of Disabled Persons, NSS 58th Round, Schedule 26, July 2002 - Dec 2002
Reference ID | DDI-IND-MOSPI-NSSO-58Rnd-Sch26-July2002-Dec2002 |
Year | 2002 |
Country | India |
Producer(s) | National Sample Survey Office |
Sponsor(s) | M/o Statistics & Programme Implementation, GOI - MOSPI - |
Collection(s) | |
Metadata | Documentation in PDF |
Created on
Aug 01, 2016
Last modified
Sep 02, 2016
Page views
211267
Sub sample
(Sub_sample)
File: Block 4_Demographic and other particulars of household members
File: Block 4_Demographic and other particulars of household members
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: character Width: 1 | Valid cases: 396943 Invalid: 0 |
An important feature of the NSS sampling design is that the total sample of first stage units is drawn in the form of two or more independent and parallel samples, termed as interpenetrating sub-samples. Each sub- sample is drawn by the same sampling scheme and is capable of providing valid estimates of the population parameters. The comparison of sub-sample wise estimates shows the margin of uncertainty associated with the combined sample estimate.
Interpenetrating sub-samples have been used in NSS (i) to obtain valid estimates from each sub-round (season) of the survey round, and (ii) to ensure that Central and State samples for any State/ UT cover independent and equally valid samples of units.
The samples surveyed by the NSSO staff are termed as Central sample and the matched samples surveyed by State Government staff are termed as State sample.
Interpenetrating sub-samples have been used in NSS (i) to obtain valid estimates from each sub-round (season) of the survey round, and (ii) to ensure that Central and State samples for any State/ UT cover independent and equally valid samples of units.
The samples surveyed by the NSSO staff are termed as Central sample and the matched samples surveyed by State Government staff are termed as State sample.
Value | Category | Cases | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Central sample | 200379 | 50.5% |
2 | State sample | 196564 | 49.5% |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.