India - Land, Livestock Holdings Survey: NSS 59th Round, Schedule 18.1_v1, January - December 2003 - Visit 1

Reference ID

DDI-IND-MOSPI-NSSO-59th-Sch18dot1-visit1-2003

Year

2003

Country

India

Producer(s)

National Sample Survey Office

Sponsor(s)

M/o Statistics & Programme Implementation, GOI - MOSPI -

Collection(s)

National Sample Survey

Metadata

Documentation in PDF

Created on

Aug 01, 2016

Last modified

Sep 02, 2016

Page views

265794

State-Region (State_Region)
File: Block-8-other-livestock-poultry-owned-recordsvisit-1

Overview

Type: Discrete
Format: character
Width: 3

Valid cases: 23332
Invalid: 0

Categories

Value	Category	Cases
011	011	74	0.3%
012	012	26	0.1%
013	013	478	2.0%
021	021	304	1.3%
031	031	63	0.3%
032	032	39	0.2%
041	041	2	0.0%
051	051	95	0.4%
061	061	45	0.2%
062	062	41	0.2%
071	071	15	0.1%
081	081	1294	5.5%
082	082	1584	6.8%
083	083	422	1.8%
084	084	511	2.2%
091	091	524	2.2%
092	092	380	1.6%
093	093	619	2.7%
094	094	103	0.4%
101	101	473	2.0%
102	102	348	1.5%
111	111	353	1.5%
121	121	487	2.1%
131	131	332	1.4%
141	141	372	1.6%
142	142	398	1.7%
151	151	577	2.5%
161	161	551	2.4%
171	171	530	2.3%
181	181	660	2.8%
182	182	946	4.1%
183	183	110	0.5%
191	191	207	0.9%
192	192	549	2.4%
193	193	675	2.9%
194	194	375	1.6%
201	201	697	3.0%
211	211	165	0.7%
212	212	172	0.7%
213	213	234	1.0%
221	221	294	1.3%
231	231	88	0.4%
232	232	26	0.1%
233	233	186	0.8%
234	234	118	0.5%
235	235	57	0.2%
236	236	49	0.2%
241	241	376	1.6%
242	242	790	3.4%
243	243	555	2.4%
244	244	247	1.1%
245	245	593	2.5%
251	251	121	0.5%
261	261	192	0.8%
271	271	122	0.5%
272	272	345	1.5%
273	273	112	0.5%
274	274	83	0.4%
275	275	115	0.5%
276	276	102	0.4%
281	281	311	1.3%
282	282	291	1.2%
283	283	67	0.3%
284	284	70	0.3%
291	291	62	0.3%
292	292	71	0.3%
293	293	148	0.6%
294	294	161	0.7%
301	301	14	0.1%
311	311	63	0.3%
321	321	346	1.5%
322	322	401	1.7%
331	331	154	0.7%
332	332	214	0.9%
333	333	299	1.3%
334	334	158	0.7%
341	341	30	0.1%
351	351	71	0.3%

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.