Digg
Google Buzz
LinkedIn
Stumbleupon
Delicious
India - Household Consumer Expenditure: 66th Round, Schedule 1.0_T1, July 2009 - June 2010 (Type-1)
| Reference ID | DDI-IND-NSSO-66-SCHEDULE-1.0T1 |
| Year | 2009 - 2010 |
| Country | India |
| Producer(s) | National Sample Survey Office,NSSO |
| Sponsor(s) | Ministry of Statistics & Programme Implementation, Govenment of Indis - MOSPI - |
| Collection(s) | |
| Metadata |
 Documentation in PDF
|
Created on
Aug 04, 2016
Last modified
Sep 02, 2016
Page views
1401301
- Identification of Sa
mple Household - Household Characteri
stics - Demographic and othe
r particulars of hou
sehold members - Consumption of cerea
ls, pulses, milk and
milk products, suga
r and salt during th
e last 30 days - Consumption of cloth
ing, bedding and foo
twear during last 30
and 365 days - Expenditure on educa
tion and medical (in
stitutional) goods a
nd services - Expenditure on misce
llaneous goods and s
ervices including me
dical (non-instituti
onal), rents and tax
es during the last 3
0 days - Expenditure for purc
hase and constructio
n (including repair
and maintenance) of
durable goods for do
mestic use - Summary of comsumer
expenditure
Variable Groups
Stratum
(Stratum)
File: Household Characteristics
File: Household Characteristics
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: character Width: 2 | Valid cases: 100855 Invalid: 0 |
Definition
Within each district of a State/ UT, generally speaking, two basic strata is formed: i) rural stratum comprising of all rural areas of the district and (ii) urban stratum comprising of all the urban areas of the district. However, within the urban areas of a district, if there are one or more towns with population 10 lakhs or more as per population census 2001 in a district, each of them is form a separate basic stratum and the remaining urban areas of the district considered as another basic stratum.
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | 5956 |  5.9%
| |
| 02 | 5331 | 5.3%
| |
| 03 | 4911 | 4.9%
| |
| 04 | 5171 | 5.1%
| |
| 05 | 3956 | 3.9%
| |
| 06 | 5125 | 5.1%
| |
| 07 | 4211 | 4.2%
| |
| 08 | 3438 | 3.4%
| |
| 09 | 3609 | 3.6%
| |
| 10 | 4043 | 4.0%
| |
| 11 | 3748 | 3.7%
| |
| 12 | 3462 | 3.4%
| |
| 13 | 3895 | 3.9%
| |
| 14 | 3312 | 3.3%
| |
| 15 | 2653 | 2.6%
| |
| 16 | 2268 | 2.2%
| |
| 17 | 2038 | 2.0%
| |
| 18 | 2491 | 2.5%
| |
| 19 | 2486 | 2.5%
| |
| 20 | 2038 | 2.0%
| |
| 21 | 2700 | 2.7%
| |
| 22 | 1448 | 1.4%
| |
| 23 | 1368 | 1.4%
| |
| 24 | 1828 | 1.8%
| |
| 25 | 1173 | 1.2%
| |
| 26 | 1612 | 1.6%
| |
| 27 | 1214 | 1.2%
| |
| 28 | 1560 | 1.5%
| |
| 29 | 983 | 1.0%
| |
| 30 | 1024 | 1.0%
| |
| 31 | 767 | 0.8%
| |
| 32 | 895 | 0.9%
| |
| 33 | 630 | 0.6%
| |
| 34 | 575 | 0.6%
| |
| 35 | 576 | 0.6%
| |
| 36 | 477 | 0.5%
| |
| 37 | 383 | 0.4%
| |
| 38 | 382 | 0.4%
| |
| 39 | 437 | 0.4%
| |
| 40 | 958 | 0.9%
| |
| 41 | 255 | 0.3%
| |
| 42 | 448 | 0.4%
| |
| 43 | 319 | 0.3%
| |
| 44 | 191 | 0.2%
| |
| 45 | 319 | 0.3%
| |
| 46 | 224 | 0.2%
| |
| 47 | 159 | 0.2%
| |
| 48 | 159 | 0.2%
| |
| 49 | 251 | 0.2%
| |
| 50 | 188 | 0.2%
| |
| 51 | 96 | 0.1%
| |
| 52 | 96 | 0.1%
| |
| 53 | 160 | 0.2%
| |
| 54 | 96 | 0.1%
| |
| 55 | 96 | 0.1%
| |
| 56 | 96 | 0.1%
| |
| 57 | 96 | 0.1%
| |
| 58 | 184 | 0.2%
| |
| 59 | 160 | 0.2%
| |
| 60 | 160 | 0.2%
| |
| 61 | 160 | 0.2%
| |
| 62 | 96 | 0.1%
| |
| 63 | 160 | 0.2%
| |
| 64 | 160 | 0.2%
| |
| 65 | 159 | 0.2%
| |
| 66 | 94 | 0.1%
| |
| 67 | 95 | 0.1%
| |
| 68 | 96 | 0.1%
| |
| 69 | 94 | 0.1%
| |
| 70 | 96 | 0.1%
| |
| 71 | 63 | 0.1%
| |
| 72 | 64 | 0.1%
| |
| 73 | 96 | 0.1%
| |
| 74 | 96 | 0.1%
| |
| 75 | 63 | 0.1%
| |
| 99 | 378 | 0.4%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.