Digg
Google Buzz
LinkedIn
Stumbleupon
Delicious
India - Household Consumer Expenditure: 66th Round, Schedule 1.0_T1, July 2009 - June 2010 (Type-1)
| Reference ID | DDI-IND-NSSO-66-SCHEDULE-1.0T1 |
| Year | 2009 - 2010 |
| Country | India |
| Producer(s) | National Sample Survey Office,NSSO |
| Sponsor(s) | Ministry of Statistics & Programme Implementation, Govenment of Indis - MOSPI - |
| Collection(s) | |
| Metadata |
 Documentation in PDF
|
Created on
Aug 04, 2016
Last modified
Sep 02, 2016
Page views
1401995
- Identification of Sa
mple Household - Household Characteri
stics - Demographic and othe
r particulars of hou
sehold members - Consumption of cerea
ls, pulses, milk and
milk products, suga
r and salt during th
e last 30 days - Consumption of cloth
ing, bedding and foo
twear during last 30
and 365 days - Expenditure on educa
tion and medical (in
stitutional) goods a
nd services - Expenditure on misce
llaneous goods and s
ervices including me
dical (non-instituti
onal), rents and tax
es during the last 3
0 days - Expenditure for purc
hase and constructio
n (including repair
and maintenance) of
durable goods for do
mestic use - Summary of comsumer
expenditure
Variable Groups
Meal on payment
(Meals_Payment)
File: Demographic and other particulars of household members
File: Demographic and other particulars of household members
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: character Width: 2 | Valid cases: 128067 Invalid: 0 |
Definition
meals received on payment' will mean that the informant has to incur some expense or part with a certain portion of his salary/wage for getting the meals. Meals purchased from hotel, restaurant or an eating-house will be considered as 'meals taken away from home on payment'
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 71091 |  55.5%
| |
| 00 | 42241 | 33.0%
| |
| 01 | 373 | 0.3%
| |
| 02 | 644 | 0.5%
| |
| 03 | 235 | 0.2%
| |
| 04 | 507 | 0.4%
| |
| 05 | 162 | 0.1%
| |
| 06 | 272 | 0.2%
| |
| 07 | 30 | 0.0%
| |
| 08 | 206 | 0.2%
| |
| 09 | 37 | 0.0%
| |
| 1 | 1009 | 0.8%
| |
| 10 | 986 | 0.8%
| |
| 11 | 21 | 0.0%
| |
| 12 | 354 | 0.3%
| |
| 13 | 12 | 0.0%
| |
| 14 | 112 | 0.1%
| |
| 15 | 317 | 0.2%
| |
| 16 | 145 | 0.1%
| |
| 17 | 11 | 0.0%
| |
| 18 | 91 | 0.1%
| |
| 19 | 7 | 0.0%
| |
| 2 | 1941 | 1.5%
| |
| 20 | 658 | 0.5%
| |
| 21 | 38 | 0.0%
| |
| 22 | 63 | 0.0%
| |
| 23 | 8 | 0.0%
| |
| 24 | 145 | 0.1%
| |
| 25 | 175 | 0.1%
| |
| 26 | 68 | 0.1%
| |
| 27 | 10 | 0.0%
| |
| 28 | 32 | 0.0%
| |
| 29 | 5 | 0.0%
| |
| 3 | 670 | 0.5%
| |
| 30 | 444 | 0.3%
| |
| 31 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 32 | 15 | 0.0%
| |
| 33 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 34 | 7 | 0.0%
| |
| 35 | 13 | 0.0%
| |
| 36 | 39 | 0.0%
| |
| 37 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 38 | 9 | 0.0%
| |
| 39 | 3 | 0.0%
| |
| 4 | 1152 | 0.9%
| |
| 40 | 140 | 0.1%
| |
| 42 | 14 | 0.0%
| |
| 44 | 31 | 0.0%
| |
| 45 | 44 | 0.0%
| |
| 46 | 18 | 0.0%
| |
| 47 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 48 | 27 | 0.0%
| |
| 49 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 5 | 553 | 0.4%
| |
| 50 | 62 | 0.0%
| |
| 51 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 52 | 35 | 0.0%
| |
| 53 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 54 | 38 | 0.0%
| |
| 55 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 56 | 46 | 0.0%
| |
| 57 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 58 | 21 | 0.0%
| |
| 6 | 654 | 0.5%
| |
| 60 | 1002 | 0.8%
| |
| 63 | 3 | 0.0%
| |
| 64 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 65 | 6 | 0.0%
| |
| 66 | 9 | 0.0%
| |
| 68 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 69 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 7 | 89 | 0.1%
| |
| 70 | 9 | 0.0%
| |
| 71 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 72 | 6 | 0.0%
| |
| 73 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 74 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 75 | 11 | 0.0%
| |
| 76 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 77 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 78 | 41 | 0.0%
| |
| 8 | 399 | 0.3%
| |
| 80 | 8 | 0.0%
| |
| 81 | 22 | 0.0%
| |
| 82 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 84 | 22 | 0.0%
| |
| 87 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 88 | 1 | 0.0%
| |
| 89 | 2 | 0.0%
| |
| 9 | 151 | 0.1%
| |
| 90 | 222 | 0.2%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.