India - Urban Slums Survey: NSS 69th Round, Schedule 0.21, July 2012 - December 2012
Reference ID | DDI-IND-MOSPI-NSSO-69Rnd-Sch-0dot21-2012 |
Year | 2012 |
Country | India |
Producer(s) | National Sample Survey Office |
Sponsor(s) | M/o Statistics & Programme Implementation, GOI - MOSPI - |
Collection(s) | |
Metadata | Documentation in PDF |
Created on
Aug 05, 2016
Last modified
Sep 02, 2016
Page views
2352420
- Block-1-Identificati
on of sample UFS blo
ck - Block-2-some salient
features of the slu
m(s) lying wholly or
partly within the s
ample UFS block - Block-3 - Characteri
stics of slum(s) lyi
ng wholly or partly
within the sample - Block-4-Change durin
g the last 5 years i
n the condition of t
he slum(s) lying who
lly or partly within
the sample UFS bloc
k. - Block-5-Particulars
of field operations
Time to canvass(hrs)
(Time_to_canvass)
File: Block-5-Particulars of field operations
File: Block-5-Particulars of field operations
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: character Width: 3 | Valid cases: 781 Invalid: 0 |
Value | Category | Cases | |
---|---|---|---|
050 | 1 | 0.1% | |
060 | 2 | 0.3% | |
075 | 1 | 0.1% | |
100 | 34 | 4.4% | |
105 | 4 | 0.5% | |
108 | 1 | 0.1% | |
110 | 23 | 2.9% | |
115 | 9 | 1.2% | |
120 | 135 | 17.3% | |
122 | 1 | 0.1% | |
124 | 1 | 0.1% | |
125 | 4 | 0.5% | |
128 | 1 | 0.1% | |
129 | 1 | 0.1% | |
130 | 10 | 1.3% | |
132 | 1 | 0.1% | |
135 | 4 | 0.5% | |
136 | 1 | 0.1% | |
138 | 1 | 0.1% | |
140 | 13 | 1.7% | |
142 | 1 | 0.1% | |
145 | 2 | 0.3% | |
150 | 13 | 1.7% | |
155 | 1 | 0.1% | |
160 | 12 | 1.5% | |
165 | 2 | 0.3% | |
170 | 1 | 0.1% | |
175 | 1 | 0.1% | |
180 | 30 | 3.8% | |
185 | 3 | 0.4% | |
190 | 2 | 0.3% | |
195 | 1 | 0.1% | |
20 | 2 | 0.3% | |
200 | 9 | 1.2% | |
210 | 1 | 0.1% | |
215 | 1 | 0.1% | |
220 | 2 | 0.3% | |
230 | 1 | 0.1% | |
235 | 1 | 0.1% | |
24 | 1 | 0.1% | |
240 | 12 | 1.5% | |
25 | 7 | 0.9% | |
260 | 1 | 0.1% | |
270 | 3 | 0.4% | |
290 | 1 | 0.1% | |
30 | 22 | 2.8% | |
300 | 7 | 0.9% | |
320 | 1 | 0.1% | |
325 | 1 | 0.1% | |
35 | 8 | 1.0% | |
350 | 2 | 0.3% | |
36 | 1 | 0.1% | |
360 | 3 | 0.4% | |
370 | 2 | 0.3% | |
40 | 26 | 3.3% | |
400 | 1 | 0.1% | |
42 | 1 | 0.1% | |
420 | 1 | 0.1% | |
45 | 36 | 4.6% | |
50 | 29 | 3.7% | |
55 | 5 | 0.6% | |
60 | 95 | 12.2% | |
62 | 2 | 0.3% | |
65 | 22 | 2.8% | |
70 | 31 | 4.0% | |
75 | 22 | 2.8% | |
76 | 1 | 0.1% | |
78 | 1 | 0.1% | |
80 | 30 | 3.8% | |
85 | 5 | 0.6% | |
90 | 59 | 7.6% | |
95 | 8 | 1.0% |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.