India - Urban Slums Survey: NSS 69th Round, Schedule 0.21, July 2012 - December 2012
Reference ID | DDI-IND-MOSPI-NSSO-69Rnd-Sch-0dot21-2012 |
Year | 2012 |
Country | India |
Producer(s) | National Sample Survey Office |
Sponsor(s) | M/o Statistics & Programme Implementation, GOI - MOSPI - |
Collection(s) | |
Metadata | Documentation in PDF |
Created on
Aug 05, 2016
Last modified
Sep 02, 2016
Page views
2349449
- Block-1-Identificati
on of sample UFS blo
ck - Block-2-some salient
features of the slu
m(s) lying wholly or
partly within the s
ample UFS block - Block-3 - Characteri
stics of slum(s) lyi
ng wholly or partly
within the sample - Block-4-Change durin
g the last 5 years i
n the condition of t
he slum(s) lying who
lly or partly within
the sample UFS bloc
k. - Block-5-Particulars
of field operations
District
(District)
File: Block-4-Change during the last 5 years in the condition of the slum(s) lying wholly or partly within the sample UFS block.
File: Block-4-Change during the last 5 years in the condition of the slum(s) lying wholly or partly within the sample UFS block.
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: character Width: 2 | Valid cases: 881 Invalid: 0 |
Value | Category | Cases | |
---|---|---|---|
01 | 44 | 5.0% | |
02 | 33 | 3.7% | |
03 | 28 | 3.2% | |
04 | 25 | 2.8% | |
05 | 21 | 2.4% | |
06 | 34 | 3.9% | |
07 | 30 | 3.4% | |
08 | 25 | 2.8% | |
09 | 41 | 4.7% | |
10 | 18 | 2.0% | |
11 | 30 | 3.4% | |
12 | 35 | 4.0% | |
13 | 21 | 2.4% | |
14 | 27 | 3.1% | |
15 | 36 | 4.1% | |
16 | 32 | 3.6% | |
17 | 50 | 5.7% | |
18 | 20 | 2.3% | |
19 | 28 | 3.2% | |
20 | 27 | 3.1% | |
21 | 45 | 5.1% | |
22 | 60 | 6.8% | |
23 | 12 | 1.4% | |
24 | 14 | 1.6% | |
25 | 20 | 2.3% | |
26 | 20 | 2.3% | |
27 | 17 | 1.9% | |
28 | 8 | 0.9% | |
29 | 13 | 1.5% | |
30 | 7 | 0.8% | |
31 | 6 | 0.7% | |
32 | 5 | 0.6% | |
33 | 4 | 0.5% | |
34 | 14 | 1.6% | |
35 | 5 | 0.6% | |
37 | 5 | 0.6% | |
43 | 1 | 0.1% | |
45 | 5 | 0.6% | |
46 | 2 | 0.2% | |
48 | 1 | 0.1% | |
99 | 12 | 1.4% |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.