India - Annual Survey of Industries: 1984-85
Reference ID | IND-CSO-ASI-1984-85 |
Year | 1985 - 1986 |
Country | India |
Producer(s) | Central Statistics Office (Industrial Statistics Wing) |
Sponsor(s) | MOSPI, Government of India - GOI - |
Collection(s) | |
Metadata | Documentation in PDF |
Created on
Jul 26, 2016
Last modified
Sep 01, 2016
Page views
285475
- IDENTIFICATION PARTI
CULARS (B1,2,6,7) - B4-FIXED ASSETS
- B5-WORKING CAPITAL
- B6-OUTSTANDING LOAN
- B8A-EMPLOYMENT AND E
MOLUMENTS - B8A86-EMPLOYMENT AND
EMOLUMENTS - B8B-EMPLOYEES BENEFI
TS - B8B88-EMPLOYMENT AND
EMOLUMENTS - B10-OTHER INPUT ITEM
S - B11-NON-IND SERVICES
COST - B11C-NON-IND SERVICE
S COST - B12-OTHER OUTPUT
- B13-MATERIALS CONSUM
ED - B13-INDUSTRIAL COMPO
NENTS - B14-PRODUCTS AND BY-
PRODUCTS-1 - B14A-DISTRIBUTIVE EX
PENSES
Variable Groups
State Code
(State)
File: B6-OUTSTANDING LOAN
File: B6-OUTSTANDING LOAN
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: numeric Width: 2 Decimals: 0 Range: 11-54 | Valid cases: 82858 Invalid: 0 Minimum: 11 Maximum: 54 Mean: 36.5 Standard deviation: 14.9 |
Questions and instructions
State Code
Value | Category | Cases | |
---|---|---|---|
11 | RAJASTHAN | 2613 | 3.2% |
12 | PUNJAB | 5821 | 7.0% |
13 | JAMMU & KASHMIR | 443 | 0.5% |
14 | HARYANA | 3105 | 3.7% |
15 | HIMACHAL PRADESH | 196 | 0.2% |
16 | DELHI | 2864 | 3.5% |
17 | CHANDIGARH | 428 | 0.5% |
21 | UTTAR PRADESH | 7517 | 9.1% |
22 | MADHYA PRADESH | 2509 | 3.0% |
31 | BIHAR | 2258 | 2.7% |
32 | ORISSA | 1033 | 1.2% |
33 | WEST BENGAL | 5021 | 6.1% |
34 | ASSAM | 1374 | 1.7% |
35 | MANIPUR | 25 | 0.0% |
36 | TRIPURA | 252 | 0.3% |
37 | NAGALAND | 0 | 0.0% |
38 | MEGHALAYA | 28 | 0.0% |
39 | ARUNCHAL PRADESH | 0 | 0.0% |
41 | ANDHRA PRADESH | 5866 | 7.1% |
42 | TAMIL NADU | 9545 | 11.5% |
43 | KERALA | 2090 | 2.5% |
44 | PONDICHERRY | 236 | 0.3% |
45 | ANDAMAN AND NICOBAR ISLANDS | 16 | 0.0% |
51 | GUJARAT | 10886 | 13.1% |
52 | MAHARASHTRA | 13884 | 16.8% |
53 | KARNATAKA | 4455 | 5.4% |
54 | DAMAN & DIU | 393 | 0.5% |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.