India - Employment and Unemployment : NSS 66th round, Schedule 10, July 2009 - June 2010
Reference ID | DDI-IND-MOSPI-NSSO-66-10-2011 |
Year | 2009 - 2010 |
Country | India |
Producer(s) | National Sample Survey Office |
Sponsor(s) | Govt. of India - - Ministry of Statistics & Programme Implementation - - |
Collection(s) | |
Metadata | Documentation in PDF |
Created on
Aug 04, 2016
Last modified
Sep 02, 2016
Page views
534865
- Block_1_2_Identifica
tion of sample house
hold and particulars
of field operation - Block_3_Household ch
aracteristics - Block_3_1_Indebtedne
ss of rural labour h
ousehold - Block_4_Demographic
particulars of house
hold members - Block_5_1_Usual prin
cipal activity parti
culars of household
members - Block_5_2_Usual subs
idiary economic acti
vity particulars of
household members - Block_5_3_Time dispo
sition during the we
ek ended on ........
...... - Block_6_Follow-up qu
estions for persons
unemployed on all th
e 7 days of the week - Block_7_1_Follow-up
questions on availab
ility for work to pe
rsons working in the
usual principal or
subsidiary status - Block_7_2_Follow-up
questions on change
of nature of work an
d_ or establishment
to persons working i
n the usual principa
l status or subsidia
ry status - Block_8_Follow-up qu
estions for persons
with usual principal
activity status cod
e 92 or 93 in col_3
of block_5_1 - Block_9_Household co
nsumer expenditure
(Recurring_Deposit_Ac_No_of_Ac_in)
File: Block_3_Household characteristics
File: Block_3_Household characteristics
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: numeric Width: 1 Decimals: 0 Range: 0-8 | Valid cases: 7469 Invalid: 93488 Minimum: 0 Maximum: 8 Mean: 1.2 Standard deviation: 0.6 |
Questions and instructions
No of recurring deposit account in the household
Value | Category | Cases | |
---|---|---|---|
0 | 351 | 4.7% | |
1 | 5796 | 77.6% | |
2 | 1055 | 14.1% | |
3 | 186 | 2.5% | |
4 | 55 | 0.7% | |
5 | 16 | 0.2% | |
6 | 6 | 0.1% | |
7 | 1 | 0.0% | |
8 | 3 | 0.0% | |
Sysmiss | 93488 |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.