India - Employment and Unemployment : NSS 66th round, Schedule 10, July 2009 - June 2010
Reference ID | DDI-IND-MOSPI-NSSO-66-10-2011 |
Year | 2009 - 2010 |
Country | India |
Producer(s) | National Sample Survey Office |
Sponsor(s) | Govt. of India - - Ministry of Statistics & Programme Implementation - - |
Collection(s) | |
Metadata | Documentation in PDF |
Created on
Aug 04, 2016
Last modified
Sep 02, 2016
Page views
534782
- Block_1_2_Identifica
tion of sample house
hold and particulars
of field operation - Block_3_Household ch
aracteristics - Block_3_1_Indebtedne
ss of rural labour h
ousehold - Block_4_Demographic
particulars of house
hold members - Block_5_1_Usual prin
cipal activity parti
culars of household
members - Block_5_2_Usual subs
idiary economic acti
vity particulars of
household members - Block_5_3_Time dispo
sition during the we
ek ended on ........
...... - Block_6_Follow-up qu
estions for persons
unemployed on all th
e 7 days of the week - Block_7_1_Follow-up
questions on availab
ility for work to pe
rsons working in the
usual principal or
subsidiary status - Block_7_2_Follow-up
questions on change
of nature of work an
d_ or establishment
to persons working i
n the usual principa
l status or subsidia
ry status - Block_8_Follow-up qu
estions for persons
with usual principal
activity status cod
e 92 or 93 in col_3
of block_5_1 - Block_9_Household co
nsumer expenditure
(NSC_SR)
File: Block_3_1_Indebtedness of rural labour household
File: Block_3_1_Indebtedness of rural labour household
Overview
Type:
Discrete Format: numeric Width: 2 Decimals: 0 Range: 1-17 | Valid cases: 12003 Invalid: 0 Minimum: 1 Maximum: 17 Mean: 3.9 Standard deviation: 2.3 |
Value | Category | Cases | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 1037 | 8.6% | |
2 | 3244 | 27.0% | |
3 | 1937 | 16.1% | |
4 | 1762 | 14.7% | |
5 | 1136 | 9.5% | |
6 | 1152 | 9.6% | |
7 | 347 | 2.9% | |
8 | 1007 | 8.4% | |
9 | 180 | 1.5% | |
10 | 104 | 0.9% | |
11 | 86 | 0.7% | |
17 | 11 | 0.1% |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.